Skip Navigation

Journal of African Economies 2006 15(4):543-570; doi:10.1093/jae/ejk010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baye, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow H23 - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
Right arrow I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
Right arrow O13 - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Other Primary Products
Right arrow O15 - Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
Right arrow O47 - Measurement of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for the Study of African Economies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Growth, Redistribution and Poverty Changes in Cameroon: A Shapley Decomposition Analysis

Francis Menjo Baye*

Department of Economics and Management, University of Yaounde II, PO Box 1365, Yaounde, Cameroon

* Corresponding author. E-mail: bayemenjo{at}yahoo.com

This paper studies the decomposition of poverty changes in Cameroon. Specifically, it reviews theoretical frameworks for growth–redistribution decomposition analyses, presents the data and poverty measures and estimates the growth–redistribution components of changes in measured poverty by the Shapley value-based approach using Cameroon's household surveys. By all the P{alpha} class of measures, poverty increased significantly between 1984 and 1996. The growth components overaccounted for the increase, although shifts in national, rural and semi-urban distributions marginally mitigated the worse effects on the population. A decline in mean incomes as well as adverse distributional shifts contributed to a significant increase in urban poverty during the same period. These findings corroborate the general information in the literature that growth effects tend to dominate the effects of changes in the distribution of income. These results illustrate the potential contribution of distributionally neutral growth in household incomes to poverty alleviation in Cameroon. Although redistribution also has an important role to play, it should be accepted that there must be severe limits to what can be achieved by growth neutral redistribution. Growth in household incomes appears more likely to be essential for long-term poverty reduction and will be more effective if poverty alleviation programmes are targeted disproportionately in favour of rural and semi-urban areas.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.