Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Thierfelder, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow F13 - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
Right arrow F14 - Country and Industry Studies of Trade
Right arrow O19 - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
Right arrow O24 - Trade Policy; Factor Movement Policy; Foreign Exchange Policy
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

J Af Eco 2003; 12:156-206
© 2003 Centre for the Study of African Economies

Article

Free Trade Agreements and the SADC Economies

Jeffrey D. Lewisa, Sherman Robinsonb and Karen Thierfelderc

aThe World Bank
bInternational Food Policy Research Institute
cUS Naval Academy

Abstract

Countries in southern Africa have engaged in a variety of trade liberalisation initiatives such as the European Union (EU)–South Africa Free Trade Agreement (FTA), the EU's ‘Everything but Arms’ (EBA) initiative to eliminate trade barriers against imports from the least developed countries and a potential FTA among Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries. In this paper we use a multi-country computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to analyse the impact of trade liberalisation in the region. First, we analyse the FTA between South Africa and the EU. Then, we consider how the rest of southern Africa might respond: (i) by enforcing an SADC FTA; (ii) by exploiting the advantages of unilateral access to the EU in addition to an SADC FTA; and (iii) by entering an FTA with the EU and other SADC countries. The scenarios are ordered such that the SADC countries pursue increased trade liberalisation. We find that under all FTA arrangements the increased total imports from FTA partners exceeds the reduction in imports from non-FTA partners — the FTAs examined are all net trade creating. Some SADC economies are slightly hurt by the FTA between the EU and South Africa, while others gain slightly. Overall, the agreement is not a beggar-thy-neighbour policy. We also find that unilateral access to the EU is more beneficial for SADC countries than an SADC FTA because the SADC countries trade more with the EU than with each other. However, reciprocal reforms under an EU–SADC FTA dominate unilateral access to the EU because they require more structural adjustment in the SADC countries. Finally, we find that South Africa is not large enough to serve as a growth pole for the region. Access to EU markets provides substantially bigger gains for the other SADC countries than access to South Africa.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Afr EconHome page
A. Keck and R. Piermartini
The Impact of Economic Partnership Agreements in Countries of the Southern African Development Community
J. Afr. Econ., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 85 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.