Journal of African Economies Advance Access first published online on August 2, 2007
This version published online on August 28, 2007
Journal of African Economies, doi:10.1093/jae/ejm018
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are Poor, Remote Areas Left behind in Agricultural Development: The Case of Tanzania
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2033 K St. NW, Washington, DC 20006, USA
* Senior Research Fellow, Markets, Trade, and Institutions Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, 2033 K St. NW, Washington, DC 20006 USA. E-mail: n.minot{at}cgiar.org
The conventional wisdom in Africa is that economic reforms may have stimulated economic growth, but the benefits of this growth have been uneven, favoring urban households and farmers with good market access. This idea, although quite plausible, has rarely been tested empirically. In this paper, we develop a new approach to measuring trends in poverty and inequality and apply it to Tanzania in order to explore the relationship between rural poverty and market access. We find that, between 1991/92 and 2003, poverty fell the least in Dar es Salaam and the most in rural areas. Rural poverty is related to remoteness, but the relationship is surprisingly weak and it varies depending on the definition used. We find little evidence that remote rural areas are being "left behind", either in relative or in absolute terms.
JEL codes: C21, D31, I32, O55, R11
The heading ‘Female Head’ in Table 1, p.12 has been deleted The heading ‘Total %’ in table 1, p.12 has been deleted Statistics in Table 5, p.29 have been moved closer together Under the ‘acknowledgements’ section on p.31, the word ‘his’ has been changed to ‘their’